Minolpongap's Blog

“What if everything you thought you knew about AIDS was wrong?”

As a child growing up I was taught by education, religion and the media that AIDS is a DEADLY Disease and will only lead to a quick, inevitable DEATH. FEAR gripped the core of my very being and like everyone else, I ACCEPTED this imposed TRUTH. HIV/AIDS became the talk of the town. Creative imaginations of skillful story tellers turned into rumors trying to establish the origin of the deadly disease. Some said it originated from a monkey and other versions claimed that several male homosexuals from an international country brought it in to the country whilst visiting. The folks in the religious circle had a different story too. “AIDS is the wrath of GOD!” was the rational. Others claimed it was witchcraft. The constant talk of it in the streets, homes and the mass media had a tremendous impact on our mind that it affected our behavior.

We were all on the lookout for any person that contracted the virus. All of a sudden our survival instincts came to life. We developed acute hearing like radar senses that was ever scanning our surrounding communities for any rumors of victims. Our Melanesian way of getting together, sharing a plate of food or a glass of water, having fun and enjoying each other’s company took an awkward turn as our fears increased. We began to socialize less and avoided a helping hand to the injured or the sick.

What was happening to us? We were behaving just like our parents and grandparents did, in the past, when the disease of leprosy was discovered on our shores. We ostracized ourselves and chose our friends very carefully.

As the disease claimed its victims, the terror increased the more. Our fears evoked hate and compelled criticisms propelled at those who were careless enough to contract the virus.

Despite our efforts to resist and avoid the supposedly deadly virus mentally and emotionally, we lost the battle and HIV/AIDS took its place in our psyche and in our reality.

But was there really a deadly virus? And if there is a “deadly virus” as we have been told it is, than what do we know about it? Is HIV really the cause of AIDS?

What is AIDS?

Since the word was coined back in the early 1980’s, up till present, there has never been a consensus standard definition of what AIDS is. Some say it’s a syndrome. Others say it is a chronic disease. Some say it is not a disease and others say that once your T-Cell (CD4) count falls below 200 than you have AIDS. Is it a Political definition or is it rather a categorization?

How is it that we have come to believe strongly this scary four letter word that our “revered” medical scientists are still undecided on how to define it?

As Arthur Schopenhauer said it so profoundly that, “All truth passes through three stages.

First, it is ridiculed.

Second, it is violently opposed.

Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

Nothing could have prepared me for what I was about to find out. Surfing through the internet to find research materials to base a chapter of a book a colleague and I are still working on, I stumbled on some information that diverted my focus. All along I had a strong inner sense that there was something wrong about the HIV/AIDS stories but I just couldn’t find the substantial evidence to confirm. Was I wrong about having this inner sensing? Am I being delusional? Are there others who exist that share the same sensing that I have?

What you are about to read may battle with the existing belief you have about HIV and AIDS and may cause a bit of resistance from a lot of you but before all “alarms” go off in your mind, I will strongly urge you to reconsider and wait it out until you get to the end of this article.

Credo Mutwa is one of the last ancient wisdom keepers of South Africa¹. His story was the one that led me to uncover a vast body of information by individuals, journalists, award winning noble laureates in the field of medical sciences and academic professors (over 2, ooo of them). They are labeled as “dissidents” against the HIV equals AIDS hypothesis.

I could not believe that these vast amounts of information dated back to the late 1980s. I was taken aback by the fact that this information was around for almost over 20 years since the first case of AIDS was discovered and I never once heard any of it. I later found out that this was due to suppression by the international mass media. I never realized the extent of my ignorance when I became exposed to the articles that made so much sense upon careful examination and analysis. One particular finding by a “dissident” exposed a fraud by the noble award winning researcher and virologist who claimed to be the founder of the virus that causes AIDS.

The founder of HIV accused & investigated for fraud

Janine Roberts is a multi-award winning investigative reporter known for her work on the Blood Diamonds of Sierra Leone, in Africa. Through a thorough and rigorous investigative work she was able to gain access to HIV Science papers that were unearthed by US Governmental Investigations into the scientific work of Dr. Robert Gallo.² Also made available in her book, ‘Fear of the invisible’, one of the papers in particular was the laboratory report done by one of Dr. Gallo’s chief investigative scientist, Dr. Mikulas Popovic. Dr. Popovic was to culture a virus (LAV)^a given by the French (Pasteur Institute) to assist in a scientific investigation to find out if the virus caused AIDS. In Dr. Popovic’s report, he stated that he was not able to determine if the virus caused AIDS;

“Despite intensive research efforts, the causative agent of AIDS has not yet been identified.”

(The original typed words of Dr. Popovic before it was fraudulently reworded by Dr. Robert Galo) ³

Ms. Roberts found out that whilst Dr. Popovic was in the lab writing his report on the findings on the (LAV) virus, which he renamed HTLV-III, Dr. Gallo was in French at the Pasteur Institute and declared that he had found the virus that supposedly causes AIDS. When Gallo returned he found Dr. Popovic’s report on his table and when reading through it he found no mention whatsoever that the virus caused AIDS. Gallo then fraudulently edited Popovic’s report and reworded it to look like he and his laboratory scientists found the virus that caused AIDS. He then sent the edited report to Science magazine and the article was published in May 1984.

Janine Roberts also discovered that there were five major investigations between 1990 and 1995 into the possible fraud in Gallo’s HIV research.

1. The first was run by the National Institute of Health’s Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI) and the Richard’s panel. It was focused on the first of the four papers published in Science magazine in May 1984, the one on which Popovic was the author.

2. The second, inquiry was under a powerful Congressional Investigative Sub-Committee headed by Rep. John Dingell. It would prevent key documents to be shredded by the National Institute of Health (NIH).

3. The third was under the Inspector General of the Department of Health and examined criminal fraud in the ‘HIV Test’ patent application.

4. The fourth was under the Office of Research Integrity of the Department of Health and Human Resources and looked for fraud, deception and ‘scientific misconduct’ in the Gallo Science papers.

5. And the fifth and last was by the US Secret Service, the body normally charged with safeguarding the security of the US President. It would check the related laboratory documents in the finest forensic lab in Washington. If any were forged, it would find out.

These investigations later revealed that Dr. Gallo admitted to fraud of the scientific research papers published in the Science Journal on May 1984 and also found guilty of scientific misconduct into his research on HIV.⁴ Dr. Gallo’s claim that he found the virus that causes AIDS and patent rights to it was proven as fraudulent because his virus (HTLV-III)^b, as uncovered by the investigations, was similar to the one (LAV) the French gave his lab to do further research and laboratory testing on. The courts then awarded equal patent rights of the virus (HIV) to the French (Pasteur Institute’s Dr. Luc Montagnier) as well.⁵

But this was all too little too late because by the time the investigations began, Gallo was earning huge sums of money and receiving huge governmental grants for his continued scientific research. The damage was already done. When Science published in 1984 that Gallo had found the virus that caused AIDS, the media and press picked up on it and sounded a nationwide and worldwide alarm concerning the discovery of a ‘deadly virus’. In the mass panic and fear, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a drug that would supposedly minimize the impact of AIDS and prolong life. AZT (also known as zidovudine) was a drug discovered in the 1960’s as a chemotherapeutic drug for cancer that was shelved after it had been proven to be too toxic for cancer patients.⁶ FDA took it off the shelves and recommended the drug to be administered to AIDS patients and later to HIV positive persons as well. Burroughs Wellcome, a big pharmaceutical company, filed a patent in 1985 to be the producer of the drug and brought AZT out into the market in 1987 as Retrovir.⁷

Is the fraud exposed by US government investigations proof enough to convince people all over the world that HIV does not cause AIDS? If the virus is not the cause than what really is the cause of AIDS? Or maybe these so called “AIDS Dissidents” have made up all these conspiracy theories just to attack Dr. Robert Galo and his cohorts just because they are all plain jealous? This is where it gets interesting so please do read on!

The Real Causes of AIDS revealed

It is a common knowledge among the medical science community that AIDS has been in existence for over 70 years prior to the discovery of the ‘virus’ that supposedly causes it and the symptoms were treated individually and cured. The Centre for Disease Control (CDC), The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), The World Health Organisation (WHO) and National Institute of Health (NIH) have grouped 25 known diseases that are known to be immune suppressive (inhibit or break down the immune system) under the heading of AIDS and have spent billions of dollars trying to find one common causative agent that is responsible but despite relentless efforts have failed to find any as yet, despite the claim that HIV is responsible. Dr. Robert Wilner mentioned in his book, ‘Deadly Deception’ that the cause of AIDS is not HIV but is the result of four known causes: ⁸

1. Malnutrition and starvation

2. Street Drugs (poppers or amyl nitrate, cocaine, alcohol, marijuana, ice, etc) and Medical Drugs

3. Radiation

4. Chemotherapy (the medical drug AZT or zidovudine, aka Retrovis, Retrovir)

Dr. Robert Wilner Injects Himself with HIV to proof there’s nothing to fear about HIV = AIDS Hypothesis.

To help us understand these causes it is best for us to have a closer look at the definition of AIDS. We all know the abbreviation stands for “Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes” but what does this medical term mean in simple laymen’s understanding? The simplest definition of AIDS is the suppression and breakdown of the body’s immune system that leaves the body vulnerable to disease causing bacteria that will inevitably lead to death. Keep this definition close in mind and I will explain to you the four causes, as identified by Dr. Wilner, of AIDS.

Firstly, poverty will lead to unhygienic living conditions and deaths due to malnutrition and starvation. If the body is not fed a good healthy meal and clean drinking water, the immune system will become suppressed because of exposure to various bacteria and break down. Africa is the exemplary case of AIDS deaths due to malnutrition and starvation.

Secondly, medical drugs and street drugs are known to be immune suppressive. It is known in the medical science community that Antibiotics are immune suppressive which is evident in newly updated antibiotic drugs being released out into the market to combat bacteria that have developed resistance to older drugs. The use of poppers or amyl-nitrite inhalers by homosexuals in the mid 70s to the 80s was the cause of Kaposi’s sarcoma. Also called idiopathic multiple pigmented hemorrhagic sarcoma is a rare and usually lethal cancer of the tissues beneath the surface of the skin or of the mucous membranes. The disease can spread to other organs, including the liver, lungs, and intestinal tract. Kaposi sarcoma is characterized by red-purple or blue-brown lesions of the skin, mucous membranes, and other organs. The skin lesions may be firm or compressible, solitary or clustered.⁹ Poppers was used as an inhalant accompanied with several antibiotics by homosexuals in their ‘bath houses’ (night clubs for gays only). The first case that was noted by victims of poppers was noted in 1981 whereby doctors were seeing young gay men all of a sudden becoming critically ill with Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia. Shortly afterwards Kaposi’s sarcoma was diagnosed as well. Medical scientists were at a loss for words to describe this new pandemic that was becoming common in the young gay community of America and initially termed it as GRID – Gay Related Immune Deficiency. The term was later changed to what we know now as AIDS.¹⁰

Thirdly, we all know the story about the atomic bomb that was dropped in Nagasaki and Hiroshima and the devastation it caused and the effects still experienced today. Exposure to radiation will result in a rapid breakdown of the immune system and death.

Finally, but certainly not the least, the leading causes of AIDS death in the world today is chemotherapy and the medical drug associated with it is AZT (azidothymidine). Just a little background, AZT is also known as zidovudine¹¹ and marketed under such names as Retrovis and Retrovir. AZT is also used as an ingredient in Combivir and Trizivir and also shares two chemical compounds, hydroxymethyl and methylpyrimidine, found in the therapeutic combo drugs Stavudine¹² and Lamivudine¹³ used in Papua New Guinea to treat HIV positive and AIDS patients. This does not end here because what I uncovered next about the function of AZT in the human body and its associated “side effects” (in medicine, side effects are really and rightfully known as Adverse or unwanted Direct Effects) stunned me. Here we have a medical drug declared highly toxic for cancer therapy and put aside only to be recalled after a little of over ten years to be declared “safe” and recommended as a “vaccine” to treat HIV and AIDS. AZT is scientifically proven to kill both healthy cells and cancerous cells leading to a complete breakdown of the human immune system and if you are reading this and understanding it correctly, this is clearly AIDS by prescription. ¹⁴ AZT enters the bone marrow and terminates DNA, the blueprint of life. Put on your intellectual caps as I point out the “adverse direct effects” of AZT compared to the other therapeutic drugs used in Papua New Guinea. The similarities in the adverse effects are highlighted in bold to point out the common symptoms of these drugs:

Chemotherapeutic Drugs for HIV/AIDS	Adverse Direct Effects
Zidovudine (AZT)¹⁵	Headaches, Malaise (depression), Nausea, loss of appetite, Lactic Acidosis or serious Liver Damage, Anemia, Neutropenia, Hepatotoxicity, Cardiomyopathy, Lymphoma or cancer, Pancytopenia
Lamivudine¹⁶	Lactic Acidosis or serious Liver Damage (too much lactic acid in the blood, signs and symptoms are yellowing of the whites of the eyes or skin, or Jaundice), diarrhea, headache, fatigue, chills, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, dizziness, Malaise (depression)
Stavudine¹⁷	Lactic Acidosis or serious liver damage, Hepatomegaly, Pancreatitis or Inflammation of the pancreas (symptoms are nausea and vomiting, fever, swollen abdomen)
Nevirapine. (Viramune, Viramune XR) ¹⁸	Diarrhea; headache; mild nausea or stomach pain; tiredness; vomiting. Severe allergic reactions (rash; hives; itching; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue); Liver damage and liver failure.
Zidolam. active ingredients -(zidovudine/AZT, Lamivudine/3TC, Nevirapine/NVP)	Headache, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, hair loss, anaemia, Neutropenia, stomach pain, loss of appetite, depression.
Nevilast.has 3 active ingredients (Stavudine, Lamivudine/3TC, Nevirapine/NVP)	Granulocytopenia (a loss of white blood cells), severe problems with liver or kidneys, lactic acidosis, osteonecrosis (death of bone tissue), Headache, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, muscle pain.
Coviro. active ingredients (Lamivudine and Stavudine)	Side effects are similar to above medical drugs.

Figure 1 – comparison of the Anti-retroviral drugs showing their similarities.

Look at the table of adverse direct effects of these medical drugs and simply by comparison you find that it paints a clear picture of the damages these chemotherapeutic drugs have on the human immune system. It may be well with you to also note that Pancytopenia, a noted “side effect” of AZT, is a medical condition in which there is a reduction in the number of red blood cells, white blood cells, and reduction of platelets. A low level of red blood cells is called anemia; a decreased number of white blood cell cells is called Leukopenia (or Neutropenia) and an inadequate number of platelets is called thrombocytopenia.¹⁹

But “wait a minute here!” Just like the rest of you, I was told by the media that HIV is responsible for killing the body’s red blood cells, white blood cells and all the other cells. The chronic problem with humanity is that we do not even bother searching out information and confirming the claims for ourselves. In unison we all nod in agreement to what the authority through the mass media tell us; we are all sheep confined in the herd. But we cannot wholly blame ourselves for our ignorance because as this information revealed herein was around for almost 20 years, we were never made aware of it by the “eyes and ears” of the nation; the press and media. But then he who owns the media, controls what information the masses receive and what information is kept from them.

This leads us to the next question that if HIV does not cause AIDS than what is the meaning of HIV Testing? Dr. Robert Gallo cannot prove that the virus causes AIDS and his colleague and co-founder of HIV, Dr. Luc Montagnier admits, in an interview featured in the video documentary The House of Numbers²⁰:

“We can be exposed to HIV many times without being chronically infected. Our immune system will get rid of the virus within a few weeks.”

In light of this proven facts, can somebody please explain to me the meaning of this “HIV Test” that is supposedly mandatory to find this virus that has been proven to be harmless?

HIV Test – Is it reliable?

The HIV Test – which by the way Dr. Robert Gallo filed a patent for and is receiving commissions for every recorded data of HIV positive cases – as I initially understood is that it is meant to determine if you had the virus or not. But what I found out is that there are several proven findings that bring the spotlight on the fallacy of the test.

Firstly, the test for HIV is 99.997% inaccurate. According to Dr. Robert Wilner’s research, he discovered that thirty thousand Russians who tested positive for HIV were than tested with another test that was supposedly far more accurate to confirm the positivity and sixty six out of the thirty thousand proved to be positive²¹. What that implies is that we are taking a test that is not only invalid but totally misleading.

Secondly, if you ask for the package insert that comes with the HIV Test Kits, such as the Western Blot, you will read that most manufacturers admit that their “HIV Tests” are unreliable.²² There are eight different criteria for diagnosing HIV infection for the western blot test kit and because there are different criteria for diagnosing HIV infection in different countries, you can be tested “positive” in one country and then tested “negative” in another country.²³ This result will also be the same for the Elisa test and that is the reason why there is an endless debate about which types of tests must be used; should two different Elisa Tests be used or should we use the Western Blot along with the Elisa. There is no standard test that can prove the positivity or negativity of the virus.

Thirdly, I thought that the only way to know if you had the virus or not is to take the HIV Test. But that is not the case. In October of 1985, an AIDS conference was held in Bangui, Central Africa where public health officials including representatives of the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) and World Health Organisation (WHO) came up with the Bangui Definition for AIDS. It was supposedly applied in countries where HIV Testing for antibodies was not available. What it means is that if a person is observed to have symptoms and signs that fall in the Bangui Criteria of diseases, he or she is given a score according to the associative symptom. If the overall score adds up to 12 points or more than the person is considered to be diagnosed with HIV and AIDS. ²⁴ Example, if the patient is observed to be: skinny, that’s 4 points; coughing, that’s 3 points, and so on. This definition is based on presumption and therefore dismisses the meaning and validity of the HIV Test.

Fourthly, the HIV Test is meant to detect the antibodies (CD4 or T4 lymphocytes) for the virus and not the virus. So a positive result indicates the low presence of antibodies and a negative result indicates presence of the antibodies at normal level (Dr. Gallo thinks that a low count of T4 lymphocytes cells [T4/T8 ratio] indicates the presence of HIV killing these cells). This clearly indicates that whoever came up with the test couldn’t create one that will specifically detect the virus but instead created one that supposedly assumes the presence of the virus when the T4 cells are low. There is still an on-going debate regarding the question of why the immune system decides to increase and decrease antibodies.²⁵

1. Your immune system produces antibodies only when you need them and reduces antibodies when you don’t need them. If you are a completely healthy person there is no need for your immune system to increase the level of antibodies unless the immune system detects a threat.

2. It is logical that when your immune system introduces antibodies into your system, it is a good sign because the antibodies will help to eradicate the threat in the system. The human body is so masterfully and wonderfully designed to take care and heal itself. GOD is not a fool; only man becomes a fool when he ignorantly consumes hazardous substances that will definitely kill the body.

Another important fact about HIV is that it is a Retrovirus and a retrovirus’ function, as commonly known in the medical science community, is completely different from what the media has portrayed. Retroviruses don’t kill their host cells.²⁶ So how is it that Dr. Gallo claims that it does and the CDC and FDA and WHO and NIH agree to this lie?

There are many other scientifically proven arguments that point out the hideousness in the claim that HIV causes AIDS but I will allow you to find that out for yourself using the references included here and other “dissident” internet source sites as well.

Dr. Luc Montagnier confesses that a Healthy Immune System can get rid of HIV within a matter of weeks.

To conclude, I would like to make it plain that though it has been scientifically proven that HIV does not cause AIDS, AIDS is a human condition that exists as well as the other six known STIs. Despite whatever picture the media paints that HIV/AIDS has no cure, it however, is scientifically proven as not true. Credo Mutwa has mentioned a plant that he and his people in South Africa have been using for generations to treat cancer and other serious illnesses and has also been treating AIDS patients to recover to full health. This herbal plant’s botanical name is Sutherlandia Frutescens (also known in English as cancer bush and balloon vine) and is known for boosting the immune system.²⁷ The “Dissident” medical practitioners have their own modalities that they use to treat their AIDS patients and they have seen improvements and better results. Dr. Gary Null treats his patients simply by advising them to take up a life-style change and has seen big improvements. Dr. Robert Wilner inoculates (injects himself) with the blood of patients who are said to be HIV positive in order to convince them that HIV is completely harmless; he remained “HIV negative” despite how many inoculations until his untimely death. Despite the efforts of so many credible and genuine people who are trying to convince people of this great lie, their efforts have been suppressed and their challenge has been ignored. AIDS is a multimillion dollar brand name and business and the main benefactors are the pharmaceutical companies and the individuals who own them. Even though a report was recently published that the threat of the world AIDS pandemic is over²⁸, the “reality” already exists in our minds and still influences our behavior at a subtle level.

We have all been raised up in a society to accept and not challenge what authority imposes on us and that is our greatest failure. We have been trained to behave like sheeps and at any moment we dared step out of the fold, there are “sheepdogs” that will try to keep us conformed. The Bible’s consequential definition of ignorance is ‘My people (nation) perish because of lack of knowledge’. Knowledge is an individual pursuit and so as freedom; knowledge and freedom go hand in hand; they are both one and the same. Therefore, I will urge you to search out the information that have been mentioned for yourself before you form whatever opinion you claim you have the democratic right to; be a lion and never a sheep.

Figure 2 – Sutherlandia Frutescens (cancer bush and balloon vine)

Key People in the Discovery of HIV

Dr. Robert Galo, Virologist

Dr. Mikulas Popovic

Co-discoverer of HIV

Chief Scientist

Director, Institute of Human Virology

National Institute of Health (NIH)

(1980 to 1989)

Dr. Luc Montagnier (MD)

Co-discoverer of HIV

French, Pasteur Institute

Note: The Gallo papers are available at John Crewdson of the Chicago Tribune’s website:

http://www.sciencefictions.net/documents.htm

SOURCES/REFERENCES

a. LAV – Lymphadenopathy Associated Virus

b. HTLV – Human T Cell Lymphotropic Virus

1. David Icke. AIDS Agenda – Genocide, ‘Credo Mutwa in plea to save Africa from illuminati genocide’, May 2001, The SPECTRUM. http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_credo_mutwa01.htm

2. Janine Roberts, ‘Fraud found in AIDS Research’, August 2008. http://www.fearoftheinvisible.com/aidsresearch

3. Janine Roberts, ‘Evidence of fraud-Key Documents’, October 2008. http://www.fearoftheinvisible.com/fraud-in-key-hiv-research-background

4. Janine Roberts, ‘Fraud found in AIDS Research’, August 2008. http://www.fearoftheinvisible.com/aidsresearch

5. New York Times, ‘Federal Inquiry Finds Misconduct By A Discoverer of the AIDS Virus, Philip J. Hilts et al, 31 December 1992, http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/phgallonyt.htm

6. Actions-Traitments, September 2005. ‘AZT patent expires’, By Sabine Vollmer, http://www.actions-traitements.org/spip.php?breve2010

7. Ibid

8. Dr. Robert Wilner, ‘Deadly Deception’, YouTube video. http://www.youtube.com/deadlydeception

9. Kaposi sarcoma, Encyclopedia Britannica, 2005 Deluxe Edition

10. Brent Leung, ‘The House of Numbers – Anatomy of an epidemic’, movie documentary, 2010, http://www.houseofnumbers.com

11. Zidovudine, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zidovudine

12. Stavudine, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stavudine

13. Lamivudine, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamivudine

14. Brian Deer, Revealed: Fatal flaws of drug that gave hope, The Sunday Times (London) April 16^th, 1989. http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/bdflaws.htm

15. Zidovudine, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zidovudine and Haley Harrison, ‘AZT Side Effects’, eHow Contributor, http://www.ehow.com/facts_5530322_azt-side-effects.html

16. Side Effects of Lamivudine, http://aids.emedtv.com/lamivudine/side-effects-of-lamivudine.html and Lamivudine Lawsuit Side Effects, http://doihavealawsuit.com/lawyer-attorney/70-side-effects-lawsuit/213-… and Lamivudine, MedlinePlus, US National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/a696011.html

17. Side Effects of Stavudine, http://std.emedtv.com/stavudine/side-effects-of-stavudine.html and Zerit (Stavudine) drug information: User reviews, side effects, http://www.rxlist.com/zerit-drug.htm

18. Nevirapine Side Effects, http://www.drugs.com/sfx/nevirapine-side-effects.html and Nevirapine, Wikipedia, Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevirapine and ‘The Trouble with Nevirapine’, Anthony Brink et al, http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/abnvp.htm, April 2002

19. Pancytopenia, http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/pancytopenia and “Definition of pancytopenia”, http://lungcancer.about.com/od/glossary/g/pancytopenia.htm and ‘Pancytopenia’, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancytopenia

20. Brent Leung, ‘The House of Numbers – Anatomy of an epidemic’, movie documentary, 2010,

21. Dr. Robert Wilner, ‘Deadly Deception- The proof that sex and HIV absolutely do not cause AIDS’, YouTube video. http://www.youtube.com/deadlydeception

22. HEAL, Toronto, ‘HIV Test Kit Manufacturers Admit Their HIV Tests Are Unreliable’, http://www.healtoronto.com/testkits.html

23. BIO/TECHNOLOGY, ‘Is a positive western blot proof of HIV infection?’. E.P Eleopulos, V.F Turner, J.M Papadimitriou et al. Volume 11, June 1993, http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/epwbtest.htm

24. Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia, ‘1985 World Health Organization AIDS surveillance

case definition’, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1985_World_Health_Organization_AIDS_su… and HIV infection and AIDS in the developing world (http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/322/7300/1475)

25. Genetica, ‘A critical analysis of the HIV-T4-Cell-AIDS Hypothesis’, E.P. Eleopulos, V.F. Turner, J.M. Papadimitriou, D. Causer, B.H. Thomas, B. Page et al., 1995, http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/ept4cells.htm

26. P.H. Duesberg, ‘Retroviruses as Carcinogens and Pathogens: Expectations and Reality’. Cancer Research 47, Department of Molecular Biology and Virus Laboratory, University of California, Berkley, California 94720,. Pp. 1199-1220. http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/pdcancer.htm

27. France News, ‘Sutherlandia Frutescens herb may help fight Aids’, May 2007. http://www.enjoyfrance.com/content/view/852/31/1

28. The Independent, ‘Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits’, J. Laurence et al., June 2008,. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/t…

Other “Dissident” internet sites:

1. http://www.garynull.com/

2. http://www.vaccineinitiative.org/

3. http://rethinkingaids.com/Content /QA/tabid/160/Default.aspx

4. http://www.suppressedscience.net/aids.html

5. http://www.virusmyth.com/

6. http://www.healtoronto.com/

“When science becomes orthodox, it seizes to be science.”

-Gary Null, MD

Download the pdf copy of this post: AIDS Deception Fraud and Lie that is killing us.pdf